The infiltration of a plane launched by Hezbollah from Lebanon to Israel, last Friday, opened a broad public and media discourse that disrupts reality and prevents its conscious analysis.The timing of the event -Evidence of Nasrallah's speech on the size of the fine missiles that it has, and weeks after the start of revealing the readiness of the anti -aircraft systems of Hezbollah in Lebanon -the party chose him in the service of its internal goals in Lebanon and created new equations towards the State of Israel.
The attempt to dwarf the event and nominate the plane "a plane tool", the goal and the need to understand reality and prepare for what will come.The talk is about a plane that infiltrated the airspace of the State of Israel, and it remained within the Israeli State of Israel for many minutes, and it returned without harm, along with a failed attempt to intercept it, all of which indicates failure.Only an accurate and uncontrolled analysis of the event of the plane's infiltration from Lebanon and its results ensures success in similar events in the future in the best way.And to know the leaders of the Air Force and the Air Defense system, I have no doubt that they will study the event and turn each stone to be better in the next event.
It is wrong to examine and analyze the event last Friday as a isolated event itself.We may notice a tendency to build an air threat with new benefits that join the missile threat, which has occupied an important place in the map of threats on the State of Israel in the last decade.Air threat replaces classic air platforms, and it is formed from small, easy -to -fly, low -flying platforms, high -speed speed, low price, easy to use, you need easy to move and hide.This has become the new "Air Force" for terrorist organizations and countries alike.
We are witnessing frequent use of the orphan and small marches on all fronts facing the State of Israel, from Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, and from Iran as well. The new air threat to the air force and in front of the air struggle system sets new challenges, the first of which is the disclosure or ability to uncover the threat before infiltrating it; Of course, the challenge of objection - after he discovers the threat and diagnoses the need to thwart and destroy it, out of the basket of objection solutions from the ground, as it was in the event mentioned by the Iron Dome system. Choosing the objection point is important to prevent the potential peripheral damage that arises after the objection and in the context of all the target wreckage, which is used for research goals and media goals.
In an attempt to dwarf the event, we have heard quite a few analyzes that say the damage is very slight, but examination of the damage should be in the contexts of the possibility of damage and in the contexts of awareness - what the enemy learns and how the event uses for its purposes. It may not be a dramatic impact of the new air threat on the balance of power, and today it has no possibility to inflict important and strategic harm, but for the new threats such as a tendency to grow like a growth such as the Qassam missiles, which initially had a load capacity for explosive materials and for a few kilometers, while within about a decade Hamas has developed for itself regular production capabilities for missiles and missiles for a hundred kilometers or more, with the ability to carry tens and hundreds of kilograms of ammunition. If we ignore the new air threat, we will meet in the various squares a great, broad, and important capabilities.
It is true that we do not have any action to address the threat of ornate marches effectively, but with my appreciation, slightly and insufficiently.Another willingness is required, otherwise we will wake up after a long period of time, on another reality in which we meet dozens of the textures and marches used at the same time towards the State of Israel.
Written by: Tsafika Haymovic
Maariv 2/23/2022